Marriage Equality And Beyond: The Facts

17 06 2013

At some point during the month of June, the US Supreme Court will issue rulings on two cases related to marriage equality.  From Center for American Progress:

In Hollingsworth v. Perry, the Court will determine the constitutionality of California’s Proposition 8, which stripped same-sex couples in California of their right to marriage in 2008. Approximately 109,000 same-sex couples lost the freedom to marry in California that year.

In United States v. Windsor, the Court will rule on the constitutionality of the Defense of Marriage Act, or DOMA, a federal law passed in 1996 that defines marriage as the union between a man and a woman for the purposes of more than 1,000 federal laws and programs. DOMA implicates everything from veterans’ benefits to immigration to federal estate taxes, and it unfairly discriminates against legally married same-sex couples by denying them federal benefits and protections currently enjoyed by opposite-sex couples.

The multiple possible outcomes of the cases, individually and collectively, make my eyes glaze over.  I am simultaneously overwhelmed by the legalese and the detached tone of discussing the fate of an entire oppressed group.  So, please refer elsewhere if you want the cases and the possible rulings explained in layperson’s terms!

(Some Of) The Facts+

But, here are some things I do know:

  • If SCOTUS provides anything short of nation-wide marriage equality, the fight for marriage equality will continue.
  • US marriage equality or not, the fight for equal rights for lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans*, and queer people is far from over.  Marriage equality represents the major LGBT issue of the moment, but it will not provide wide-sweeping protections from discrimination and assurance of equal treatment and access.   Other pertinent issues remain: adoption for LGBT couples; LGBT-inclusive nondiscrimination laws; LGBT-inclusive immigration policies; repealing the policies that force trans* people out of the military; ending violence against LGBT people; including LGBT people in educational curriculum and the media; banning reparative therapy; demedicalizing gender non-conformity and trans* identities; LGBT-friendly policies for older adults; etc, etc, etc!  Addressing other issues not directly related to sexual or gender identity would also improve the lives and status of LGBT people (e.g., poverty).
  • Since prejudice toward interracial couples and families, and multiracial/multiethnic people lingers years after the US ruled against anti-miscegenation laws, we can expect homo-, bi-, and transphobia to continue well beyond the inevitable legalization of same-gender marriages.  Fortunately, Americans’ approval of marriage equality precedes legal action (unlike the course interracial marriage took), so, arguably, we will not have as far to go to eliminate antipathy toward same-gender couples.  But, pessimism (or is it being realistic?) will not allow me to be so hopeful.

Here are some strong guesses as to what may come in the near future:

  • Whether we have nation-wide marriage equality by July 1st or more years of legal and political battles, the realization of same-gender couples as equal and worthy of legal recognition will improve the status of LGBT people.  These couples will find stability in external recognition and celebration (benefits, tax breaks, family approval).
  • The health and well-being of LGBT individuals will be improved, as well — married or not.  Marriage equality alone will not bring this, but it will certainly help.  Being free from discrimination, prejudice, and violence, as well as the constant fear of these aspects of trans-, bi-, and homophobia will also improve things for LGBT people.
  • The next Democrat presidential candidate will fully support marriage equality from the start of their campaign.  And, I suspect, like President Obama’s re-election, their stance on the issue will play little role in their chances for the election (that is, to those outside of LGBT communities).
  • It will be a looooonggg time before a LGBT person will be elected president.  Let me clarify.  He will probably be a white cisgender married gay man with liberal-moderate views.  All else being “normal” will allow America to “see past” his sexual identity.  And, America will be ready to breathe a sigh of relief that the era of post-homophobia has been ushered in.

Finally, here is one more fact (read: my opinion, which is shared by fellow LGBT people and our allies):





Another Consequence Of Homophobia: Overcompensation?

14 06 2013

In my and other scholars’ research, the damage of discrimination to one’s health and well-being is clear.  On top of the constraints discriminatory treatment places on one’s life chances and livelihood, victims of discrimination are furthered burdened by the blow to their sense of justice and fairness, and their well-being.  It is no surprise then that so much research focuses on discrimination as a mechanism through which social inequality is maintained.

From my personal life, exercised in my professional life but not as a topic of research, I know well about the “positive” consequences of prejudice and discrimination.  I do not mean positive as in good or desirable.  Rather, I mean the consequences that otherwise would be good or desirable if they were not the product of facing discrimination or prejudice.  I mean the sense of solidarity with fellow members of one’s oppressed group, pride in one’s identity and community, and a drive to persevere and overcome adversity.

The “Gay Tax”

I know well of the “Black tax” that I and other Black people face, having to work twice as hard to receive equal recognition.  This is because Black people are stereotyped as unmotivated, unintelligent, culturally inferior, unprofessional, and immoral.  I find myself particularly concerned with how others will evaluate me and my work.  I find myself having to give a second thought to people who don’t give me a first.  It is hard for me to let trivial slights go because I refuse to be undervalued or underestimated.

In comparing how I navigate this homophobic society as a gay man to the “Black tax,” I can discern a “gay tax” that manifests as regulating (read: suppressing) my gender and sexuality.  To minimize heterosexual men’s discomfort with my sexuality, I remain physically and emotionally distant, and “man up” my gender presentation.  To dodge religious folks’ judgement, I make as little reference to my sexuality as possible.  And, as many couples do, my partner and I are rarely affectionate in public.

All at once, I am aware of these aspects of the “gay tax,” critical of them, but pay them for my safety and well-being.

Another “Gay Tax”: Overcompensation?

But there may be another aspect to the “gay tax” that is similar to the “Black tax.”  Aware of the devalued status of lesbian, gay, and bisexual people in society, some gay men have expressed through autobiographies that they throw themselves into their work to elevate their status.  Maybe, just maybe, if you are the first gay president, the world will see you just as “the president.”

In a recent study, Pachankisa and Hatzenbuehler (2013) found support for the “best little boy in the world” thesis.  In a sample of gay and heterosexual male college students, their results suggest that gay men are more likely than heterosexual men to derive their self-worth from academics, appearance, and competition.  And, the length of time that gay men remained in the closet, and the level of homophobic prejudice and discrimination in their state, were strong predictors of the extent to which these young gay men derive their self-worth from competition.

It’s the idea that young, closeted men deflect attention from their sexuality by investing in recognized markers of success: good grades, athletic achievement, elite employment and so on. Overcompensating in competitive arenas affords these men a sense of self-worth that their concealment diminishes (from NYT review).

The downside of this “positive” consequences of the stigma gay men face is their health and well-being.  Through a nine-day diary, these gay men’s focus on elevating their status (either professionally or aesthetically) predicted long periods of isolation, interpersonal problems, unhealthy eating behaviors, and emotional distress.

All Gay Men?  What About Women?

The researchers devoted a great deal of discussion to the generalizability of their findings.  With a non-random sample of gay male college students, there is reason to worry that these findings do not translate into the experiences of all gay men, particularly those from economically disadvantaged backgrounds.  Further, the sample is overwhelmingly white.  So, in a blog post about the article, the lead author noted:

Importantly, like the authors of “best little boy in the world” narratives, the participants in our study were mostly white, middle class, college-educated men.  The extent to which possessing multiple stigmatized identities might shape self-worth remains to be seen, as does the extent to which this or a similar phenomenon applies to women.

In addition to assessing how other gay men (especially gay men of color, working-class gay men, older gay men), are affected by and respond to homophobia, one curiosity remains: what about women?

What about female sexual minorities, you might ask? “The notion of the ‘best little boy in the world’ crops up everywhere in stories about gay men’s early lives and not as much in the narratives of young lesbians,” lead researcher John Pachankis of Yeshiva University told me in an email. “That certainly doesn’t mean that women don’t experience a similar phenomenon, but only that lesbians’ personal stories don’t seem to emphasize it as much.” Exploring that particular question is a next step for research, he says.

Ironically, the language of “overcompensating” has been used in discussions of this study, but without explicit reference to the gendered notions of (men’s) overcompensation.  It may be the case that these young men are emasculated by homophobia, and they (like many men) have found some way to compensate in their effort to measure up to the rigid expectations of masculinity.  And, funny enough, many appear to set their sights on arenas that are not vehemently homophobic — academics and aesthetics.  Athletics, sex with lots of men, and big trucks do not seem to top the list of the things gay men wish to brag about.  So, this raises some interesting (unaddressed) questions about gay masculinity.

That’s Me!

Ah, yet another study where I, as a scholar, am humbled to reminded that I am a human, equally affected by the social world as everyone else.  In his NY Times article, federal lawyer Adam D. Chandler echoed some of these sentiments:

But seeing your reflection in an empirical study has its drawbacks. The flip side of discovering you’re not alone is the melting of your presumed snowflake uniqueness. Now I’m a statistic, another data point, just an ordinary overachieving closet case.

That’s bad enough. What’s worse is that the biography is half finished. They haven’t told me what’s on the other side of the closet door. Once I’m no longer harboring my secret, will I lose my drive? Or will my lifelong trophy hunt expand to include a search for a trophy husband?

I don’t know the answers. But I’m ready to find out.

Toward (Some Of) The Answers

Like any manifestation or consequence of oppression, a starting point is becoming aware of this drive to overcompensate.  This is yet another aspect of the homophobic reality gay men note and challenge in raising our gay consciousnesses.  And, I can provide (some of) the answers Chandler wants.

In a general sense, strong social support will help to minimize some of the distress.  And, having multiple roles or other important, ongoing tasks, events, affiliations, relationships, etc. is beneficial as well.  We do ourselves a disservice as gay men by isolating ourselves — that’s the opposite of seeking social support and others like us (as well as supportive allies).  By focusing narrowly on elevating our status, we place so much stock into too few things, leaving us vulnerable to having our entire self-worth tank when those aspects of our status do not go well.

But, more specific to gay men is a strong, positive gay identity and connection to the LGBT community that helps to buffer the harmful effects of our exposure to prejudice and discrimination.  While inevitable, how we respond to these stressful aspects of homophobic oppression can reduce their impact to our health — namely, challenging discriminatory treatment and confiding in trusted others about these experiences rather than accepting and repressing them.  And, rejecting (rather than internalizing) the homophobic prejudice and stereotypes of our society, and general self-acceptance are crucial for our well-being.  I recommend (again) Dr. Crystal Fleming‘s advice on rejecting others’ stereotypes and hatred.

The lead author of the study, a psychologist, offered the following recommendations:

Our research also reveals some important lessons for young gay men’s health and well-being.  The results of our research suggest that gay men take careful stock of the extent to which their self-worth derives from seeking status from domains like being the best, looking the best, or earning high grades or lots of money.  If gay men do recognize that their self-worth comes from those domains, they might consider the health costs of doing so.  Do they experience trouble in relationships with others, such as frequent arguing or spending lots of time alone?  Will they compromise personal values to attain status?  Are they chronically stressed or engaging in unhealthy habits, like going to the gym to an unhealthy degree or restricting their food intake?

If gay men answer “yes” to any of these questions, it will first be important to recognize that these difficulties are not personal failings and may have their source in stigma and the early lessons learned from growing up in a stigmatizing world.  Psychotherapy with a compassionate, gay-affirmative therapist can help gay men understand the legacy of experiencing early stressors like hiding one’s sexual orientation during adolescence or growing up in homophobic environments.  For many gay men, the negative effects of these early experiences may not be obvious at first, but can nonetheless be successfully addressed with supportive help from friends or professionals.

In understanding this “gay tax” as a stressor unique to gay men (similar to the “tax” that other oppressed groups face), I also recommend mental health service that treat patients who are gay as gay patients.  That is, care that understands the unique needs and experiences of gay people, rather than treating them as interchangeable with any other patient.  I strongly recommend The Velvet Rage: Overcoming the Pain of Growing Up Gay in a Straight Man’s World

Oh, and eliminating homophobic prejudice and discrimination helps, too!





Link Roundup: Equality And Diversity In Academia

13 06 2013

Later this summer, I will be joining my colleagues in sociology for our annual national conference, hosted by the American Sociological Association.  This year’s theme is “Interrogating Inequality: Linking Micro and Macro.”  I am pleased to see that this focus on inequality — really the core topic of most sociological research — includes some inward reflection, as well.  Two sessions caught my eye:

  1. “Revisiting the 2003 ASA Race Statement,” a thematic session that asks whether we should continue to examine race and ethnicity in sociological research on inequality.  Scheduled for Sunday, August 11th, 10:30am-12:10pm.  Featuring panelists Nancy Lopez, David R. Williams, Michael Omi, Lynn Weber, Felice J. Levine, Roberta M. Spalter-Roth, and Deborah K. King.
  2. “Interrogating Inequalities within Sociology,” a thematic session that “will showcase critical analysis of inequality about sociology and its effects on our paradigms, concepts, methods, and findings.”  We, as a discipline, are stronger when sociologists of diverse backgrounds and perspectives are included and equally valued.  This panel, co-sponsored by the Committee on the Status of Women in Sociology, features Alenxadra Kalev, Eduardo Bonilla-Silva, Joey Sprague, Roberta M. Spalter-Roth, Rodney D. Coates, and Erin Leahey.

I have also come across a number of stories in the past few weeks on the status of equality and diversity in academia in general.





Two Interesting CFPs (Call For Papers) On Religion And Intersectionality

12 06 2013

Intersectionality and/or religion should take note of two interesting special journal issues.

The first is from Gender & Society: special issue on the intersections between religion and gender.  Deadline: September 1, 2013.  Download the CFP description [PDF] for more information.  Submit online and specify in your cover letter that the paper is to be considered for this special issue.

We welcome papers that interrogate the gendered nature of religious communities, movements, and experiences while recognizing the centrality of religion in the lives of many communities and individuals. Especially welcome are papers that highlight transnational work that is grounded in deep regional knowledge, papers that bridge different religions, and papers that contribute to theorizing of major conceptual debates in the study of gender and sociology more generally.

The second is from Journal of Homosexuality: special issue, “To Be Black, Queer, and Christian: Critical Essays on the Black Church and Sexuality.”  Deadline: August 15, 2013.  Download the CFP description [PDF] for more information.  Submit by email to Darnell L. Moore (dm2980 at columbia.edu).

This special edition invites nuanced analyses of the black church, race, sexuality, gender, and class. We seek articles from scholars and practitioners that engage interdisciplinary frameworks and who work at the intersections of critical race theory, queer theory, black liberation theology, queer theology and feminist thought. This special edition seeks to intervene in ongoing conversations on sexuality, queer subjectivities, and black Christianity within the academy and public sphere.

We invite contributions that respond to the following queries: 1). How might black religiosity (i.e. its theologies, practices, hermeneutics, etc.) be queered? 2). How do the black struggle for liberation and queer struggle for civil liberties traverse and depart from, complement and frustrate, the deconstruction of dominant, heteropatriarchal theologies of sexuality within the black church? 3). What types of counterhegemonic pastoral tools and practices can be developed and employed that are responsive to the specific cultural and religious needs of black churches?





Actually, Racism Is Probably Worse Than We Realize

11 06 2013

In 2008, the argument that race has declined in importance became the crystallized “post-racial” thesis upon the election of President Barack Obama.  By his re-election in 2012, some had offered clarification that race still exists, but it is racism that has disappeared – the “post-racism” thesis.  There it sits, almost as a sense of relief — “whew, now we can stop tip-toeing around people of color, and supporting these race-related causes like Affirmative Action.”

On day 2 of George Zimmerman’s trial for the murder of Trayvon Martin, the supposed reality of post-racism contrasts with that of the hyperrelevance of race and racism.  A young Black man was killed because his race made him a suspect.

Today, Blackness is still a crime, and whites are charged with the task of policing Black people.  The harshness of law enforcement and the criminal justice system is magnified for Blacks, from the use of excessive force to longer sentences to denial of justice all together.  Even those who are not police officers, judges, and lawyers serve to police Blacks; the days of lynching Black women and men has merely evolved into a calmer form of extralegal vigilance.

For example:

My blood boiled as I watched this video.  I posted it in various places on Facebook, expecting similar outrage.  The video was widely shared, but often introduced with concerned, but surprisingly calm notes: “watch this”; “wow”; “this is messed up.”  Those were comments mostly comments from white people.

But, even some Black folks articulated concern, but little surprise.  In fact, a few people seemed to think that it was problematic that I was surprised, and that they are superior in some way for being unmoved.  The unsympathetic response of “why are you surprised?” stung, playing on my fear that I am “not Black enough” or “too white” to fully comprehend the severity of contemporary racism.  I suppose the anonymity of the internet is a dual-edged sword, where hostility is widely expressed and, absent of an in-person connection, there is little expression of empathy and solidarity.

Racism Is Worse Than We Realize

As I further processed my reactions to this video, I realized that my surprise and anger are warranted.  Yes, in the self-confident sense where I do not need to justify my feelings, or shape or suppress them according to others’ opinions.  But, also because the sheer pervasiveness and severity of racism cannot be fully comprehended by one person.  Even as a researcher, I am unable to see every instance, manifestation, and consequence of racism in every corner of the world.

Like this video, racism that hides behind seemingly race-neutral interactions, laws, and practices is harder to see, and near impossible to prove exists.  Today, we are dealing with consciously suppressed and unconscious racial prejudice — both which shape behaviors.  Few racists openly, proudly identify themselves as racists, and most racists do not even know that they are racist.

Racial discrimination, too, is harder to identify, particularly absent of outwardly expressed racial bias.  It is no longer limited to exclusion at the entry point or first contact.  The “whites only” sign has to be implied since it cannot be hung from the front door.  We may be hired, but then harassed on the job or denied opportunities to advance.  We may receive a loan, but are offered one that is economically risky.

On the ground, we cannot see other interactions to “accurately” assess whether we have been discriminated against.  (This speaks to the importance of research to look at the broader patterns!)  Like the racial profiling video above, Black people may suspect unfair or differential treatment driven by racial prejudice, but rarely can we compare the same situation experienced by a white person.  Even in some of the recent audit studies that demonstrate racial discrimination in the labor force, some of the participants were unaware of the discriminatory treatment they faced until they compared notes with others and the researchers.

In reality, racism and the pervasiveness of racial discrimination are likely far worse than we can imagine.  So, I stand by my surprise because it is a reasonable reaction to such harsh reminders of the everyday consequences of racism.  But, also because I much prefer to hope for something better than resign myself to accept the world as it is.





Tear-Jerker Expedia Commercial Features Same-Gender Wedding

8 06 2013

Earlier this week, Cheerios received very nasty, racist responses to its new commercial featuring an interracial family.  It’s 2013, and racist prejudice still reveals its ugly presence every once in a while to remind us that it still exists.  The shift toward tolerance for same-gender couples is years behind majority tolerance of interracial couples.  So, I suspect it takes a great deal more bravery for companies to support LGBT rights and marriage equality, let alone feature LGBT people and same-gender couples in their advertising.

But, the pro-LGBT companies are coming forward, explicitly resisting homophobes’ efforts to re-erase LGBT people.  The newest pro-LGBT advertisement is an Expedia commercial that features a father attending the wedding of his daughter and her (female) partner.  See it below.

This one differs from other advertisements which either feature still photos of same-gender couples, or even a quick, passing (semi-subtle) reference to same-gender marriage.  It is almost like a mini-movie, with tension, character development, and a happy ending.  What I appreciate is that it takes on the father’s perspective, and that he struggled with how to navigate his daughter’s “new” life and relationship.  This is an honest portrayal of how many parents come around to accepting their LGBT children.  (I suspect that few come out to parents who have been LGBT-friendly all of their lives.)

Expedia has been an explicitly LGBT-friendly company for years.  But, until this commercial, that friendliness was only expressed to and known among LGBT communities.  They, like many companies, advertise to LGBT consumers, but save themselves the homophobic backlash by ensuring that only LGBT people know that.  Now, they have made the bold step (though after others) to tell heterosexual, cisgender America that they are LGBT-friendly.

Uh oh… the gay storm is coming.  Hallelujah!





Multiracial People And Interracial Couples Exist. Get Used To It!

7 06 2013

How could this Cheerios commercial of an adorable biracial girl, daughter of a Black man and a white woman, spark enraged comments about “racial genocide” and Nazism?

The Cheerios commercial initially went unnoticed.  Once featured and discussed online, the company was forced to close comments on the YouTube version after receiving a flood of hostile, racist comments.  Since I am late to hear of the story, I cannot find an archive of these comments.  But, here is one:

One comment read: “They want to throw white children and coloured children into the melting pot of integration, out of which will come a conglomerated, mulatto, MONGREL class of people! Both races will be destroyed in such a movement. I for one, under God will die before I’ll yield one inch…”

Wow, it is 2013, our president is mixed Black and white, and we are still seeing references to “mullatoes” and fear of “racial genocide.”  So much for declaring America “post-racial” or “post-racist.”  As some have pointed out, the rise of social media has opened the door for more anonymous racism.

“I’m not surprised at the reaction, because social media is kind of the new Ku Klux Klan white hood,’’ TODAY’s Star Jones said Monday. “It allows you to be anonymous and to say the kinds of things that you would never say to a person to their face.”

I gagged when Star Jones mentioned the KKK!  But, she is probably right.  She goes on to say it may be a generational matter, with the younger generation more open to interracial families.  But, with the overrepresentation of young people on the web, these awful comments were (at least in part) their expression of prejudice.  Really, with all of the news of cyberbullying, we may be giving youth a little too much credit for being completely free of prejudice.

As the other guest on the TODAY show noted, there are few commercials like this.  Every once in a while, you may see a quick flash of a young, probably unmarried interracial couple (without kids).  Maybe more folks can tolerate this kind of young “experimentation,” as long as they settle down within the race.  But, to have a interracial family, with a daughter?  Gasp!  And, for such an underwhelming commercial; there is no interracial intimacy, for the Black father and white mother are not even in the same room.

I wish there would have been a similar uproar about the negative representation of multiracial people in Starburst’s commercials — the idea of being mixed as a “contradiction” akin to being a zombie or a screaming mime.  I emailed Starburst to complain and got a flippant response; so, they will probably continue airing and making those kinds of commercials.  So, c’mon Cheerios and other companies, and media in general — please keep portraying interracial families and multiracial people.  It is high time that Americans get used to seeing people who have existed as long as race has existed!