It’s Time To Talk About Fatphobia

6 06 2013

DFP SuitAs soon as my partner asked, “are you sure you want to wear that?”, I knew the body image issues would come flowing out of me.  Up to that point, I had kept them at a controllable level — like water at a slow boil, contained within the pot.  We were getting ready for our friends’ wedding.  Getting dressed up is usually a bit of an emotional roller coaster for me, so I knew to start the process off with a good sassy tune to perk up my mood.  And, if I get my look right in the first attempt, there is a good chance I am out of the door lookin’ cute and feelin’ cute.  So, when my partner raised concerns that my vest and slacks did not match, I knew that having to reevaluate would disrupt this very delicate balance of self-esteem and body image issues.  Moments later, I went back and forth between saying “I hate my body” and “fuck this fatphobic society!”

I have been fat most of my life, probably starting around age 7 or 8.  As a consequence of our society’s emphasis on thinness and, particularly for men, muscular physique, I have struggled with hating my body most of my life.  But, only in the past year or so have I grown critical of society’s prejudice toward fat people (fatphobia).  So, with this latest episode of internalized fatphobia, ending with my partner saying, “I really hate when you get like that,” I knew the time was coming to talk about fatphobia, at least with myself.

Fat Consciousness

In recent years, I have made (some) peace with my weight.  I would rather devote my energy on exercising my mind than my body, though I do know that exercising both is beneficial, and I cannot (and don’t) completely ignore my body.  I became assured enough to counter concerns raised about my weight from family members with, “it’s not me who has a problem with my weight.”  But, I am a far cry from being a proud fat person.  Unfortunately, I still retain enough of society’s anti-fat prejudice that thoughts too embarrassing to share publicly cross my mind, like “oh, I can just starve myself for a week to drop a few pounds.”  I am smart enough to snap myself out of it, but it concerns me that such thoughts still cross my mind every once in a while.

Why not be proud?  I did the heavy soul-searching, and drew on my own strength and the support of others like me to become a proud queer man.  The days of considering taking my own life as a consequence of society’s vehement homophobia were limited to my adolescence.  And, I have never hated myself for being a person of color, or even multiracial; my parents instilled a sense of racial pride and awareness from my birth.  So, why then, do I let fatphobia get to me?

One major issue has been the delayed consciousness of fatphobia.  I, like the rest of society, am only recently beginning to notice that fat people are frequent targets of prejudice and discrimination.  This is more than “innocent” teasing in the school yard.  Earlier this week, an evolutionary psychologist posted an awful comment on Twitter (see image below):  “Dear obese PhD applicants: if you didn’t have the willpower to stop eating carbs, you won’t have the willpower to do a dissertation #truth.”

Fortunately (for him), his stupidity of openly expressing his fatphobic prejudice will have little bearing on his career:

What Geoffrey Miller, a University of New Mexico professor who is a visiting professor at NYU, said on Sunday on his personal Twitter account was regrettable.  Professor Miller apologized for the Tweet and deleted it. NYU considers the matter closed.

But, the audacity to end his tweet with “#truth” — wow.  Actually, that is not true.  Several PhDs and soon-to-be PhDs have proudly submitted their names and images to a growing list of fat PhDs.

And, to add my own #truth, my fat behind sat in my chair for long hours to start and finish my dissertation (on top of applying for jobs) in a year.  To brag a little, I put my committee’s concerns to rest that I wouldn’t finish and/or wouldn’t get a job, finishing graduate school in 6 years (one year less than the typical minimum, and two less than average).  My decision to eat (rather than lack of decision or willpower not to eat) is irrelevant to my decision to work.  (I am actually a little fatter because of working on my dissertation, which is true for many people of all shapes and sizes.)  More importantly, it is high time to put to rest the stereotype that fat people are fat because they are lazy.

PhD Graduation, IU ('13)

PhD Graduation, IU (’13)

Fatphobia As A System Of Oppression (?)

I suspect a second reason that there is a delay in recognizing fatphobia is hesitation to define it as oppression.  Sure, we know that fat people are the targets of prejudice.  Increasingly, we are recognizing that fatphobic prejudice seems to translate into behaviors and, sometimes, even policies and practices.  Yup, with pervasive unfair treatment against fat people, this constitutes a form of discriminationfatphobic discrimination.  And, this discrimination has real consequences for the health, well-being, and life chances of fat people.

Beyond interpersonal interactions, there is a constant barrage of negative images in the media, coupled with the medical institution‘s obsession with obesity as a health problem.  One of the most appalling things I saw in medical research was viewing positive body image in fat women (as though they are delusional) as a problem, specifically as a hindrance to them losing weight.  Certainly perception of one’s body, specifically one’s weight, is a concern in terms of anorexia, bulimia, and other eating disorders.  However, I find it troubling to view comfort with one’s body, or even fat pride, as a problem.  For now, until we fully tease out how much of the poor health faced by fat people is the consequence of fatphobia, I remain skeptical of the automatic conflation of fatness with poor health.

But, does fatphobia constitute a system of oppression?  In simply raising the question, the “oppression olympics” come to mind.  There is no question that the history of prejudice, discrimination, and violence faced by women and people of color are what define sexism and racism as systems of a oppression.  More recent consideration has been given to homophobia and heterosexism, as well, which actually discounts just how old and pervasive they are.  But, to my knowledge, fat people have never been enslaved or formally excluded from important social institutions.

What further complicates this question is how wrapped up fatphobia is with gender (and sexism) and other identities (and systems of oppression).  I do not mean to suggest that attending to these important intersections is bad or even problematic; rather, as an outsider, much of what I have seen around anti-fatphobia activism and scholarship has donned the face of white cisgender women (for now) (but hopefully I am wrong).

Fatphobia As A System Of Oppression!

But, I stop there.  To the extent that fatphobia exists both as pervasive antipathy toward and discrimination against fat people, it counts as a system of oppression in my book.  One that deserves no less attention than sexism, transphobia, racism, homophobia, and classism.  More work is needed to document how widespread such prejudice and discrimination is, and to eliminate it (e.g., education, changing laws and policies, changing practices).  In particular, more research is needed to assess the social experience of being fat (and the extent to which this shapes one’s health), not merely obesity as a “health problem.”  And, more energy should be devoted to developing a fat consciousness and, ideally, fat pride.

It is a shame that, on top of all of the external hostility and unfair treatment, so many fat people harbor internalized fatphobia; unlike Black pride, grrl power, or LGBT pride, we, as fat people, do society’s dirty work to hate our own bodies (and even other fat people).  Okay folks!  It is time we start talking about (and working to eliminate) fatphobia.





Today Is The Trevor Project Day (National Suicide Prevention Month)

27 09 2012
Talk to Me

Things will get better!

September 2012 has been National Suicide Prevention Month.  Suicide remains a critical social and public health issue.  But, findings from a new study indicate that suicide now takes more lives each year than car accidents.  And, for some segments of the country — especially lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) youth — the need to address suicide and the factors that influence mental illness and suicidality remains urgent.

Today, September 27th, is being celebrated as The Trevor Project Day.  The Trevor Project serves as a national suicide prevention organization, especially for LGBT youth.  Trevor is promoting a campaign – Talk To Me – to encourage all people to reach out to others who may be struggling.  The Executive Director/CEO of the Trevor Project, Abbe Land, provided a nice description of the campaign at Huffington Post:

Saying “talk to me” to a friend can spark conversations that encourage positive help-seeking behaviors by letting a friend know that you care about them and are willing to listen without judgment. Once a conversation is started, that bond of trust presents an opportunity to connect a friend in crisis to life-affirming resources. In short, with just three simple words, “talk to me,” each one of us can potentially help save a life.

“Talk to me” is a universal message that applies to people of all ages and backgrounds, including parents, students, faith leaders, childcare providers, teachers, co-workers, and family members. It is crucial that we come together and let those in crisis know that they are not alone. During National Suicide Prevention Month, vow to be someone who is ready to listen without judgment and connect a friend or family member with supportive resources if they are ever in crisis.

Trevor has also made a nice video, that tugs just a little at your heart strings, to convey the importance of talking to others and letting them know they are not alone:

Talk To Me

Unfortunately, the darkness of social isolation and self-hatred are familiar memories of my youth before coming out, developing a sense of pride as a queer person, and gaining my family’s acceptance.  So, campaigns like this one, and the It Gets Better Campaign speak right to me.  (I’ve written a bit on them here and here.)  The message I typically try to convey is one of hope: things will get better!  But, with the spin of empowering oneself to make things better.  For example, as much as I love the It Gets Better Campaign, I share others’ concern that we should emphasize that “it gets better” with action, that things don’t magically get better while you wait.  In my opinion, hopelessness is a major culprit in the depression and low self-worth that people who are considering suicide feel.  Things have gotten so bad that there is no hope for improvement, nor hope for the future.  So, I add to my message of hope, “and, you have the power to make them better!”

But, in line with the Talk To Me campaign, it is important to remember that the support and encouragement of others is crucial.  In fact, it is hostility, bullying, avoidance, discrimination, and so forth that contribute to the depression and suicidality that LGBT youth face.  It takes feeling seen, heard, validated, loved, valued, and accepted to be empowered and maintain high self-esteem.  And, as emphasized by this campaign, the smallest gestures can make a world of difference in the day of a struggling, depressed person.  (I often stand on my soapbox about the importance of random acts of kindness, or really just being polite and respectful to every person you encounter, because you just don’t know how much good you may do for other people.)

Talk To MeS

MeS — plural.  While many LGBT youth struggle with depression, low self-esteem, suicidality, and problems with their peers, not all do.  So, it is important to be aware, but not to assume, and especially not to stereotype, every LGBT youth as suicidal.  Further, one point I often emphasize, is that there are other important identities that we hold.  The struggles faced by white LGBT youth may overlap with, but are not identical to those of Black and other LGBT youth of color.  In fact, in some ways, LGBT youth of color may face additional challenges not experienced by their white LGBT peers.  It is important to consider the intersections among sexual identity, gender, race and ethnicity, nationality, social class, body shape and size, religion, ability, and so forth.  It is our challenge, then, to be aware that there is no one universal set of experiences and, as such, there is no one universal solution; but, we must not be deterred from reaching out to every person to remind them of their worth and significance as a person no matter their background.





[kinsey] What Is Transphobia? And, What Is Cissexism?

24 01 2012

This was originally posted at Kinsey Confidential.

People whose lives, experiences, and sense of self are outside of the gender binary of woman and man/female and male are a consistent part of world history.  In fact, there have been societies and cultures in the past that recognize, and even celebrate, a third genderToday, however, individuals we now know as transgender or gender non-conforming face pervasive prejudice, discrimination, violence, and invisibility around the world.

What Is Transphobia?

I have written in earlier posts about who transgender and gender non-conforming people are.  There is a great deal of diversity among transgender and gender non-conforming, most notably in terms of gender identity and gender expression.  Yet, these communities are also diverse in terms of race and ethnicity, age, sexual identity, social class, nationality, body shape and size, and so forth.

But, one commonality that transgender and gender non-conforming people share in the US and worldwide is exposure to prejudice, discrimination, violence, and invisibility.  Transphobia is a set of negative attitudes toward, fear and hatred of transgender and gender non-conforming people.  This, like homophobia can be thought of as the prejudice that many cisgender (i.e., non-transgender) people hold toward transgender and gender non-conforming people.

Recent debates over passing laws to protect and include transgender and gender non-conforming people from discrimination provide a great example of the hostility many cispeople hold toward transpeople.  Examples of transphobia include: myths and stereotypes (e.g., that transwomen are men posing as women to rape other women in the restroom); negative portrayals of transgender and gender non-conforming people in the media; trivializing or ignoring a transperson’s gender identity.  New research suggests that even elementary school-aged children hold transphobic (and homophobic) attitudes.

What Is Transphobic Discrimination And Violence?

Typically fueled by transphobia (hostility, fear, hatred) is transphobic discrimination and violence. These are negative, hostile, or harmful acts and behaviors directed at transgender and gender non-conforming people.  Similar to homophobic and biphobic discrimination, there are (at least) three levels of transphobic discrimination:

  • Interpersonal transphobic discrimination: this occurs at the individual level.  That is, one person or a small group of people discriminate against another person or group of people.  This often occurs in the workplace, for example, as unfairly firing or denying a job or promotion to a person because of their actual or perceived gender identity and expression.
  • Organizational transphobic discrimination: this occurs at the organizational level.  Typically, this occurs when a company or organization has formally or informally set or enacted a rule to treat transgender and gender non-conforming people differently (i.e., worse) than cisgender people.  The Girl Scouts of America is an example of an organization that explicitly includes transgender and gender non-conforming people.  Despite the repeal of the Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell policy, now allowing LGB people to openly serve, the US military still excludes transgender and gender non-conforming people from serving.
  • Structural transphobic discrimination: this occurs at the structural or societal level.  This form of discrimination exists in laws, policies, and macro-level values and practices that privilege cisgender people over transgender and gender non-conforming people.  Structural transphobic discrimination is related to, or sometimes called, cissexism, the set of attitudes and behaviors which value and normalize cisgender people, while keeping transgender and gender non-conforming people invisible or treating them as inferior or deviant.

Transphobic violence is threatened or actual violence toward transgender and gender non-conforming people.  While this typically occurs at the individual level, it, like other hate crimes, sends a message to the entire transgender and gender non-conforming community that they are inferior, hated, and should feel unsafe.

Some Consequences Of Transphobic Prejudice, Discrimination, And Violence

While there is a growing body of research that examines the consequences of prejudice, discrimination, and violence faced by LGB people, little is known about the consequences of these experiences for transgender and gender non-conforming people.  Some of the consequences of these hostile, unfair, and harmful acts are obvious and immediate.  These range from from the physical and emotional damage caused by transphobic violence to the increased risk for poverty and homelessness due to limited and constrained job opportunities because of transphobic discrimination.  The added stress (known as “minority stress“)of hostile attitudes and treatment for transgender and gender non-conforming people wears on their health, placing them at elevated levels of physical, mental, and sexual health problems.

Additionally, because of transgender and gender non-conforming people are stigmatized, many are afraid to come out.  This translates, for some, into hiding one’s true identity and sense of self from others.  And, related to the stigma associated with homosexuality and bisexuality, the strict social norms regarding gender identity, gender expression, and sexuality also constrain the freedoms of cisgender people, as well.  We all risk facing ridicule, being shunned, or even experiencing discrimination and violence, if we step outside of the narrow range of acceptable gender identities and expressions.  As others have said, transphobia hurts us all.





[kinsey] A Look At The Lives Of Transgender and Gender Nonconforming Adults

11 10 2011

This was originally posted at Kinsey Confidential.

Happy National Coming Out Day!  Today, like every October 11th, we celebrate the lives of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) people, take pride in being “out of the closet,” and reflect on how far we have to go to achieve full sexual and gender equality.  An important part of this celebration is acknowledging the diversity even within LGBT communities and, more importantly, raising awareness about the unique experiences of subgroups within the larger LGBT population.

The National Transgender Discrimination Survey

Before Chaz Bono, author and transgender son of Cher and Sonny Bono, joined the show Dancing With the Stars, transgender people gained more visibility with the release of the National Transgender Discrimination Survey.  This survey, conducted by the National Center for Transgender Equality and the National Lesbian and Gay Task Force, captures a glimpse of the lives of over 6,000 transgender and gender non-conforming adults in the United States.  The results of the survey, which I summarize below, provide a picture of this population’s experiences with prejudice and discrimination, in employment, health care, and education, and their demographic profile (e.g., race, age, income).

Who Are Transgender And Gender Non-Comforming People?

Although the use of the acronym LGBT is intended to be as inclusive as possible, we actually lump several unique subpopulations together in referring to “transgender” people (the T in LGBT).  Although still lumping multiple groups, one important distinction is between transgender and gender non-conforming individuals.  Transgender and gender non-conforming individuals share their distinction from cisgender people in that their gender identity and/or gender expression differs from (or does not “match”) their sex assigned at birth.

For many transgender people, namely transsexuals, this entails planned (“pre-op”), partial, or complete (“post-op”) transition from their sex assigned at birth to their current gender identity; however, many transgender people do not pursue such surgical or hormonal treatment (“non-op”).  The reasons for forgoing this transition vary, including the high costs that are typically not covered by health insurance or lack of health care access all together, disinterest in or limited options to physically altering one’s body, or fear of the potential side effects of surgery or taking hormones.  Gender non-conforming individuals differ in their gender expression in that they fall outside of (e.g., a third gender) or somewhere in between (e.g., androgyny) the traditional gender binary (female and male).

As I noted above, both of these terms represent multiple subgroups.  Within the umbrella of transgender, there are individuals who identify as transgender, MTF (male-to-female) or transwomen, FTM (female-to-male) or transmen, transsexual, and two-spirit.  The umbrella of gender non-conforming includes individuals who identify as gender non-conforming, genderqueer, cross-dresser, androgynous, third gender, feminine male, masculine or butch female, aggressive, as well as drag kings and drag kings.  Yet, for some individuals, these categories overlap or co-exist, most notably intersex people, whose biological sex (including chromosomes, anatomy, and hormones) does not neatly fit into female or male.

It is of crucial important to distinguish these gender identities and expressions from sexual orientation and identity; although some lesbian, gay, bisexual, and queer people are also transgender or gender non-conforming, gender identity/expression is a distinct personal and social characteristic from sexual orientation/identity.

The Lives Of Transgender And Gender Non-Conforming People

The National Transgender Discrimination Survey offers an extensive look at the lives and experiences of transgender and gender non-conforming adults in the United States, including a look at the economic and employment profile and health profile of this population.  You can see the executive summary here and the full report here, as well as video overview here.  The survey offers a number of important key findings:

  • Over 40% of respondents reported attempting suicide at some point in the past, compared to the 1.6% in the general (predominantly cisgender) population.  The rates of suicide attempts are much higher among transgender and gender non-conforming adults who have been unfairly fired from a job, harassed or bullied in school, physically or sexually assaulted, and/or who live in poverty.
  • Many respondents live in extreme poverty.  In fact, this population is four times more likely than the general population to live in households with annual incomes less than $10,000.
  • Among transgender and gender non-conforming adults who were “out” in elementary, middle, and/or high school, the majority were harassed, one-third were physically assaulted, and 12% were raped or sexually assaulted.  These experiences with violence were so severe that they led 15% to leave school.
  • Respondents are twice as likely as the general population to be currently unemployed.  For racial and ethnic transgender and gender non-conforming adults, the rate is four times the general population.  Almost half reported being unfairly fired, denied a job or promotion, and 50% reported being harassed at work.  The majority have avoided discrimination by either hiding their gender identity/expression or delaying their gender transition.
  • A substantial number have faced housing discrimination, and have been homeless at some point because of their gender identity/expression.
  • Over half have faced harassment or disrespect in public accommodations, including hotels, restaurants, public transportation, and government agencies.
  • Overall, transgender and gender non-conforming people report higher rates of HIV infection, alcohol and drug use, and smoking.  Many have either faced discrimination in health care or been denied care altogether.  Half reported that they have had to teach their medical providers about transgender care.
  • Over 50% have been rejected by some or all of their family members because of their gender identity/expression.  HIV incidence and attempt suicide rates are substantially lower among those whose families are accepting.

Now What?

The National Transgender Discrimination Survey is an important and overdue assessment of the state of transgender and gender non-conforming individuals’ lives in the United States.  Now, with more insight into this populations’ experiences with transphobic prejudice and discrimination, poverty, family rejection, and illness, advocates, politicians, medical professionals, and researchers can make steps to improve the lives of transgender and gender non-conforming people.  For example, these findings suggest that LGBT activists’ focus on ending Don’t Ask Don’t Tell, same-sex marriage, and other issues of sexual equality must also include pushing for social change that addresses the unique needs of transgender and gender non-conforming people.  It also means seriously rethinking access to various institutions (e.g., college), as well as services and care (especially medical care), that continue to use the traditional gender binary of female and male.

While increasing visibility of transgender and gender non-conforming people is an important first step, there remains a great deal of work to improve the lives of this population and ensure equal status for all regardless of gender identity and expression.